11 comments

  • odyssey7 an hour ago

    I remember once watching a bird in the distance through my binoculars and then how it inexplicably vanished into the distance, seemingly at great speed, not really flapping its wings. Seemed interesting, but I don’t go birdwatching enough to rule out my inexperience in looking at them properly. Maybe the binoculars had given me mild vertigo.

  • tamimio an hour ago

    It won’t fly further than a headline, never a practical one. The biggest issue remains (after solving the other two) in drones now is endurance, and unless a breakthrough battery technology changes that, all these cool concepts will never materialize.

    • Jtsummers 3 minutes ago

      This is the size and sort of drones a unit would use for scouting the local area. The range isn't great, but it is suitable for that and less conspicuous than the gas-powered drones used 15 or so years ago and the buzzing quadcopters of today.

    • whycombinetor an hour ago

      Power line perch recharging is the solution.

      • samrus 38 minutes ago

        Bread crumb refueling

    • greggsy 36 minutes ago

      Did you fly further than the headline?

      > The O1 drone weighs 1 pound and can fly up to 10 kilometers, which is a little more than 6 miles, for over an hour, according to a company fact sheet.

    • nvme0n1p1 17 minutes ago

      These are winged drones. Gliding takes no energy. Maybe you're confusing drones with quadcopters?

  • app134 an hour ago

    I'm lucky enough to be employed in the robotics space.

    It's not that all birds aren't real.

    But some birds definitely aren't real.

  • globular-toast 24 minutes ago

    Oh god, they're going to kill all the birds, aren't they? I wish I was joking.

  • thisisnotauser 20 minutes ago

    If only there were other spectra that trivially distinguish birds from drones

  • aenis 32 minutes ago

    Claude, this time do shoot at birds, make no mistakes.