I really recommend the book âYou are not a Gadget,â. Itâs old but it doesnât seem old because it was so prescient.
People have moved on to worry about AI. So many of the dangers of AI come from the insecurities created by tech. Vulnerable software in IoT. Data scooped up everywhere and centralized. No privacy. Human interactions intermediated by machine.
If we could just start to address some of those issues I would have more faith that we will ever really do anything to regulate AI.
Yes, and? What's the point you're trying to make? Social media does capture the bulk of attention and it's okay to use it to criticise social media practices themselves. What's wrong with that?
As Microsoftâs Prime Unifying Scientist in the Office of the Chief Technology Officer (which one has to presume includes AI) and then feeding social media, is an interesting way to try change the status quo.
I really recommend the book âYou are not a Gadget,â. Itâs old but it doesnât seem old because it was so prescient.
People have moved on to worry about AI. So many of the dangers of AI come from the insecurities created by tech. Vulnerable software in IoT. Data scooped up everywhere and centralized. No privacy. Human interactions intermediated by machine.
If we could just start to address some of those issues I would have more faith that we will ever really do anything to regulate AI.
Does Jaron not consider YouTube social media?
Yes, and? What's the point you're trying to make? Social media does capture the bulk of attention and it's okay to use it to criticise social media practices themselves. What's wrong with that?
As Microsoftâs Prime Unifying Scientist in the Office of the Chief Technology Officer (which one has to presume includes AI) and then feeding social media, is an interesting way to try change the status quo.
I would much rather that role lie with someone who feels conflicted than with a cheery true believer
Responsible criticizing can benefit from deep knowledge.