33 comments

  • ideasphere an hour ago

    This is the illustrator: https://linktr.ee/owenyeconiel

    It’s cool they hired an actual person but if I was so happy with their work to write-up a whole article about it, I’d be crediting them in a much more prominent way!

    • stronglikedan an hour ago

      The illustrator probably didn't want to pay for more prominent credit than the standard, which is included at the end of the post.

  • palmotea 36 minutes ago

    1. Hiring a human illustrator is the right thing to do, and I applaud this guy.

    2. AI kinda ruined this style for me. The first thing I did when I saw it was start searching for AI incongruities which is sad.

    • beachy 21 minutes ago

      The really sad thing is that the natural instinct for many will be to screenshot the page and upload it with "please create me a home assistant dashboard in this style".

  • skyberrys an hour ago

    The illustrator did beautiful work, it's amazing how much different your program became from the original dashboard to one simple home gui.

  • gerdesj 33 minutes ago

    Great job and a cracking write up. The notes on making sure you get layers etc right so you can animate effectively is great advice.

    Thank you.

  • Tellusion 2 hours ago

    I love that you hired an illustrator to make this!

  • zerolunier 2 days ago

    where are you based, how much you paid for it ?

  • minasrc 2 hours ago

    appreciate you sharing the artist name!

    • an hour ago
      [deleted]
  • melody_calling a day ago

    Really well done, nice work!

  • nharziro 2 days ago

    this is so cool! i love it.

    • phs318u 2 hours ago

      Perhaps “cool” is the wrong word. Did you notice the temperature recorded inside the house? 24degC (26 in the office). A little too warm for my taste.

      • stavros 40 minutes ago

        Unless it was taken in the summer, in which case it's really cold.

  • dzhiurgis 2 days ago

    This is beautiful. Reminds me floor796.

    I used AI to get it draw it. What worked is giving floor plan I already had and putting some labels on it - brown dining table here, fridge here, etc.

    What didn't work was giving it bunch of photos and asking it to just figure it out. For things it did figure out - it was nice, but it made way too make mistakes.

    The entire point of it was to put light switches and heaters on the map so I don't have to fiddle with a number of toggles in a table/list.

    p.s. I wish I had huge eink display for home assistant dashboards. Some concepts I made and seen online are glorious.

  • Legend2440 an hour ago

    Cool, but if you can afford to hire an illustrator to make a custom dashboard for your lights and thermostat, you're clearly in the 1%.

    • AuthAuth 4 minutes ago

      Its $100 at most. Thats something majority of people can afford.

    • sho_hn an hour ago

      I've commissioned art before via the Krita web forum's job section. Lots of bright young artists, many of them students, that do great work for affordable prices to build their portfolios.

      You don't really need to be in the 1% to be a patron if you need some art.

    • krisbolton an hour ago

      Disposable income and being in the 1% are entirely different things.

    • kenferry an hour ago

      How much do you they think they paid? By home improvement standards, might not be out of line at all.

      I agree it just feels weird to spend on “software” for home improvement, but sometimes it may make a bigger difference than the hardware!

    • loloquwowndueo 35 minutes ago

      You say it like it’s a bad thing?

    • fragmede an hour ago

      I'm not sure what that is supposed to convey. This person was able to scrape together a couple bucks to pay someone to draw a picture of their house in a specific way. You've never paid for any art or entertainment? Netflix?

    • aussiethebob 6 minutes ago

      And?

  • _virtu 2 hours ago

    Pro tip you don’t even need an illustrator. While I do encourage hiring humans to do this work you can also use PolyCam with a phone that supports lidar, export it to Claude with Blender and voila.

    • tiagod 2 hours ago

      Pro tip the whole point is that it was made by an illustrator, and that's also the reason it's on the frontpage.

      • scubbo 40 minutes ago

        It's _better_ that the illustrations were made by an illustrator, but it still would have been cool and front-page-worthy if that hadn't been the case.

      • vntok an hour ago

        Maybe the reason is simply that it's a cool idea?

        This is typically the kind of hacking project that is preposterously non-economically-viable for 99% of homelabbers, let alone regular folks. Now, for the first time ever, AI is making it actually palatable for everyone who wants it done to have it done... and certainly much cheaper too at an equivalent quality level.

        • KZerda 10 minutes ago

          Commissioning art like this is at most a few hundred dollars. As was posted elsewhere, there are lots of young artists that need to pad out their portfolios, as well as artists in places where the cost of living is significantly cheaper. This isn't a multi-thousand-dollar thing that only the 1% could afford.

        • orphea 37 minutes ago

          I'm sorry, I have a hard time understanding you. Correct me if I'm wrong, are you saying that

          1. paying an illustrator is non-economically-viable for 99% of homelabbers? and

          2. AI would have done it at an equivalent quality level?

    • hatthew 43 minutes ago

      Most people don't have lidar phones, and commissioning this art is about the same price as buying a lidar phone.

      • happyopossum 33 minutes ago

        > Most people don't have lidar phones

        the most popular phones in the US (iPhone pro max and pro) have had lidar cameras for the past 6 models...

        • dwnw 12 minutes ago

          Most people don't have lidar phones. The statement is still very true, even if you said US only. What are you trying to say?

  • cringleycringe 2 minutes ago

    I hired an AI to do it faster and cheaper