It’s a sad side effect of the AI revolution that no one knows what is real and trustworthy anymore. I saw a “rare” photo someone shared on Reddit of Hitler and it received tons of comments until it was pointed out that it’s definitely not a real photo.
With products coming out like this, many claim to do basically the same thing.
How is this better than Claude Code's built in agent orchestrator? Do I need 100 agent types? How do I know the trained agents here are somehow better? Specialization doesn't equate to "better" in every case.
I want to see the light but at this point it feels like these kinds of projects need a better way to benchmark how they are improving on the available state of the art.
It feels like in 2018, a new browser state management tool emerging. Why does this exist?
This is the level of quality you can expect from `ruvnet` projects: https://github.com/deletexiumu/wifi-densepose
As a very pro-AI person, this is exactly what I would define AI slop.
---
The whole thing is a scam: https://cognitum.one/
It’s a sad side effect of the AI revolution that no one knows what is real and trustworthy anymore. I saw a “rare” photo someone shared on Reddit of Hitler and it received tons of comments until it was pointed out that it’s definitely not a real photo.
With products coming out like this, many claim to do basically the same thing.
How is this better than Claude Code's built in agent orchestrator? Do I need 100 agent types? How do I know the trained agents here are somehow better? Specialization doesn't equate to "better" in every case.
I want to see the light but at this point it feels like these kinds of projects need a better way to benchmark how they are improving on the available state of the art.
It feels like in 2018, a new browser state management tool emerging. Why does this exist?
Most of the things on the linked doc's list of things Claude Code can't do, it definitely can.
I'd call this optimistic overengineering. Throw every fad at a problem, rather solving a problem iteratively.
[dead]