9 comments

  • HelloUsername 2 hours ago

    Related: "Single bone in Spain offers first direct evidence of Hannibal's war elephants" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46917005 06-feb-2026 40 comments

  • shevy-java an hour ago

    > A second-century Roman mosaic of a war elephant in Tunisia

    It is quite interesting to see that the depicted elephant has wrong proportions. This makes one wonder whether the artist who created that mosaic, ever saw an elephant himself.

    • sonofhans 28 minutes ago

      Pure speculation, of course, but I would say so. The hump in the back; the small, high, tail; dominant forehead — those are all things missed by people who mis-draw elephants. I think this artist got them right, which is hard to do from description alone.

      • bertil a few seconds ago

        I’m very tempted to agree with you: people who draw from description draw unicorns after being told about rhinoceroses. We have a lot of medieval monks’ drawings of elephants by description and theirs look like tapir with a trumpet stuck in their nose. This is not a photo, of course but it mainly highlights the head, like any one would if they didn’t measured proportions carefully.

    • drekipus 37 minutes ago

      Wrong to elephants today

  • __alexander an hour ago

    Everyone should visit Córdoba, Spain once in their life.

  • bryanrasmussen 3 hours ago

    original title: Archaeologists Unearthed a 2,200-Year-Old Bone. They Say It Could Be the First Direct Evidence of Hannibal’s Legendary War Elephants

  • sickofparadox 2 hours ago

    At this rate, we're only a few years away from discovering evidence for Herodotus' giant ants.

    • shakna 2 hours ago

      Peissel claimed that was marmots and totally real, didn't they?